5 Explosive Reasons Why Pakistan Rejects India’s Assertions on Terror and Regional Stability

Pakistan rejects India’s assertions made by Indian External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar, firmly dismissing them as irresponsible, misleading, and reflective of New Delhi’s persistent efforts to deflect attention from its own destabilising actions in South Asia.

In a sharply worded statement issued on Saturday, Pakistan’s Foreign Office (FO) accused India of promoting terrorism, sponsoring covert operations, and undermining regional peace—claims that reignited tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours.

India’s Allegations and Jaishankar’s Controversial Remarks

The latest diplomatic fallout followed remarks attributed to Dr Jaishankar in Indian media, including The Hindu, where he suggested that India had the right to defend itself against what he described as terrorism emanating from “bad neighbours,” clearly alluding to Pakistan.

Referring to decades of strained relations, Jaishankar asserted that goodwill gestures—such as water-sharing arrangements—could not continue if terrorism persisted. His comments also targeted the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), one of the world’s most enduring transboundary water agreements.

External reference: The Indus Waters Treaty

Pakistan’s Foreign Office Issues a Firm and Scathing Rebuttal

Responding swiftly, the FO stated that Pakistan rejects India’s assertions and condemned the remarks as a deliberate attempt to obscure India’s own “troubling record as a neighbour that promotes terrorism and contributes to regional instability.”

According to the FO, India’s allegations lack evidence and ignore well-documented instances of Indian involvement in destabilising activities inside Pakistan.

Kashmir Occupation and Human Rights Concerns

Another central theme of Pakistan’s response was India’s continued military occupation of Jammu and Kashmir, which the FO described as illegal and violent.

Pakistan reaffirmed its unwavering political, moral, and diplomatic support for the Kashmiri people’s right to self-determination, as guaranteed under multiple UN Security Council resolutions.

External Reference: UNSC Resolutions on Kashmir – United Nations

The FO emphasised that India’s internal repression in Kashmir cannot be masked by shifting blame onto Pakistan.

Indus Waters Treaty Under Renewed Diplomatic Strain

A particularly sensitive element of the dispute centres on the Indus Waters Treaty, signed in 1960 and brokered by the World Bank.

Pakistan warned that any unilateral attempt by India to suspend or violate the treaty would undermine regional stability and severely damage India’s credibility as a state that claims to respect international legal obligations.

“Pakistan will take all necessary measures to safeguard its legitimate rights under the treaty,” the FO stated.

Regional Stability and Escalating Diplomatic Risks

Analysts warn that India’s rhetoric—particularly linking water-sharing to terrorism allegations—sets a dangerous precedent in South Asia, a region already grappling with climate stress, water scarcity, and unresolved political disputes.

Pakistan’s position remains that bilateral issues must be addressed through dialogue, international law, and existing frameworks rather than coercive diplomacy.

Rare Diplomatic Contact in Dhaka Raises Questions

Interestingly, the escalation comes shortly after a rare moment of diplomatic engagement, when Pakistan’s National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq and Dr Jaishankar briefly shook hands in Dhaka during the funeral of former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Khaleda Zia.

The encounter marked the first high-level contact between Pakistani and Indian officials since the May 2025 military conflict, raising cautious hopes for de-escalation—hopes now overshadowed by renewed hostility.

International Law, Credibility, and the Way Forward

Pakistan maintains that durable peace in South Asia requires:

• Respect for international treaties
• An end to covert operations
• Meaningful dialogue on Kashmir
• Adherence to international humanitarian law

By contrast, Islamabad argues that India’s current posture risks isolating itself diplomatically while destabilising an already fragile region.

Conclusion

As tensions flare once again, Pakistan rejects India’s assertions with a clear and forceful narrative: that New Delhi’s allegations are politically motivated, legally untenable, and strategically dangerous.

With water security, regional peace, and international credibility at stake, Pakistan has signalled it will defend its sovereignty and treaty rights through diplomatic, legal, and international channels—leaving the ball firmly in India’s court.